FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 09 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDMOND H. GALTON, No. 09-56943
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:09-cv-01188-DOC-
MLG
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of MEMORANDUM *
Social Security,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 24, 2011 **
Before: PREGERSON, THOMAS, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Edmond H. Galton appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of benefits. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Lewis v. Astrue, 498
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
F.3d 909, 911 (9th Cir. 2007). We affirm.
Contrary to Galton’s contentions, the Administrate Law Judge’s decision did
not go beyond the scope of the remand order because, as the district court had
instructed, the Administrative Law Judge on remand determined whether there was
any work in the economy that Galton could perform in light of all his impairments,
including dyslexia.
Galton’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
2 09-56943