United States v. Ricardo Rochin-Jerez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 20 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10405 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00476-PMP-RJJ v. MEMORANDUM * RICARDO ROCHIN-JEREZ, a.k.a. Francisco Camargo-Peralta, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Ricardo Rochin-Jerez appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Rochin-Jerez contends that his sentence, at the bottom of the Guidelines, is substantively unreasonable because it included a 16-level increase for his previous conviction of an alien smuggling offense. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, including the seriousness of Rochin-Jerez’s crimes and deterring future criminal conduct, the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRMED. 2 10-30257