FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 24 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NARCISCO BARRERA MORALES, No. 07-74865
Petitioner, Agency No. A097-873-044
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 15, 2011 **
Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Narcisco Barrera Morales, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Morales failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S.
citizen children. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d
975, 979 (9th Cir. 2009).
Morales’s contention that the IJ did not properly consider and weigh all
evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim. Martinez-Rosas
v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
2 07-74865