Marcus Weatherspoon v. E. McDaniels

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 24 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARCUS WEATHERSPOON, No. 08-16582 Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:04-CV-00664-RLH v. MEMORANDUM * E.K. McDANIEL, Warden, and BRIAN SANDOVAL, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Roger L. Hunt, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted June 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Nevada state prisoner Marcus Weatherspoon appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Weatherspoon contends that his trial lawyer rendered ineffective assistance by failing to call Gloria Banks as a witness. The Nevada Supreme Court denied this claim, holding that Weatherspoon failed to demonstrate that his counsel acted unreasonably. The record shows that the state court did not unreasonably apply Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). Weatherspoon is therefore not entitled to habeas relief. See Harrington v. Richter, 131 S. Ct. 770, 785-87 (2011). Weatherspoon’s motion to supplement the record is denied. AFFIRMED. 2 08-16582