United States v. Jose Reyna-Robles

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 24 2011 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-10093 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02546-RCC v. MEMORANDUM * JOSE LUIS REYNA-ROBLES, a.k.a. Jose Reyna-Robles, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 15, 2011 ** Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Jose Luis Reyna-Robles appeals from the sentence of 13 months and one day imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). we affirm. Reyna-Robles contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because he should have been granted a departure or variance based on cultural assimilation. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, Reyna-Robles’s sentence within the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). AFFIRMED. 2 10-10093