FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 28 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MANDIP SINGH; KAMALJIT SINGH, No. 08-72926
Petitioners, Agency Nos. A078-656-947
A078-656-948
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, MEMORANDUM *
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 19, 2010 **
Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Mandip Singh and Kamaljit Singh, natives and citizens of India, petition for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision denying their third
motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
abuse of discretion, Lin v. Holder, 588 F.3d 981, 984 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny
the petition for review.
In its June 2008 order, the BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying
petitioners’ third motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred, where it
was filed three years after the BIA’s final order of removal, and petitioners failed
to establish any exception to the time and number bars. See 8 C.F.R. §
1003.2(c)(2).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 08-72926