UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1051
MARK A. PANOWICZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION; SHARON L. HANCOCK, in individual
capacity; SHARON L. HANCOCK, Clerk of the Court, Circuit
Court for Charles County (in official capacity),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00259-LO-TCB)
Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Panowicz, Appellant Pro Se. Ronda Brown Esaw,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, McLean, Virginia; Hugh Scott Curtis, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Panowicz appeals the district court’s order
dismissing with prejudice his civil complaint for lack of
personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12(b)(2), (b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court at the hearing held on
September 24, 2010. Panowicz v. Sprint Nextel Corp., No. 1:10-
cv-00259-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2010; see Mot. Hr’g 15-22,
ECF No. 36). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2