Daniel Heily v. Woodcrest Properties

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1062 DANIEL E. HEILY; WARREN HEILY; C.M. WELCH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. WOODCREST PROPERTIES, (partnership); GENERAL PARTNER, WOODCREST PROPERTIES; GVK VENTURES, (partnership); GENERAL PARTNER GVK VENTURES; JAMES D TODD; HOUSTIN I TODD; V-K PROPERTIES, INC.; PAUL P VAMES, President, V-K Properties, Inc.; RUTH T EDWARDS, Secretary/Treasurer V-K Properties, Inc.; STUANHOPE PROPERTIES, L.L.C.; V-K PROPERTIES OF VIRGINIA, (partnership); GENERAL PARTNER, V-K Properties of Virginia; SALLY VENT; ENGLEWOOD APARTMENTS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:10-cv-00094-gec) Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 5, 2011 Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daniel E. Heily; Warren Heily; C.M. Welch, Appellants Pro Se. William Entenmann Shmidheiser, III, LENHART & OBENSHAIN, PC, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Daniel E. Heily, Warren Heily, and C.M. Welch appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Heily v. Woodcrest Properties, No. 5:10-cv-00094-gec (W.D. Va. Dec. 16, 2010). We deny Appellants’ motions to strike Appellees’ brief and to recuse their attorney. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2