FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 18 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LONNIE DAWSON, No. 10-55383
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:08-cv-01070-AHS
v.
MEMORANDUM *
NORWOOD, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Alicemarie H. Stotler, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 12, 2011 **
Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner Lonnie Dawson appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Dawson challenges the prison disciplinary decision finding him guilty of
using a telephone to further criminal activity and resulting in a 60-day loss of good
time credits. Specifically, Dawson contends that his due process rights were
violated during the disciplinary hearing because the incident report improperly
charged him with violating Code 197 instead of Code 197A and because the
discipline hearing officer’s decision is not supported by some evidence. The
record reflects that Dawson received all process that was due and that some
evidence supports the disciplinary findings. See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S.
539, 563-67 (1974); see also Superintendent v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 (1985).
AFFIRMED.
2 10-55383