NOTE: This order is nonprecedentiaL
mniteb ~tate~ Court of §ppeaI~
for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit
MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,
Appellant,
v.
DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Appellee,
AND
TRANSWORKS, INC.,
Appellee.
2011-1161
(Reexamination No. 95/000,368)
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
ON MOTION
ORDER
MELVINO TECH v. KAPPOS 2
Melvino Technologies Limited moves for a 30-day ex-
tension of time, until August 10, 2011, to file its reply
brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT
JJll 9 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Scott A. Horstemeyer, Esq.
FILED
Raymond T. Chen, Esq. U.S- COU.RT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FtDERAl CIRCUIT
Thomas J. Scott, Jr., Esq.
s21 JUL 1 920tl
JANHORBALY
CLERK