NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 10-1806
_____________
ROBERT R. BAREFOOT;
DEONNA ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Appellants
v.
WELLNESS PUBLISHING; HOLT M.D. CONSULTING, INC.;
NATURES BENEFIT, INC.; STEPHEN HOLT,
_____________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(Civ. No. 3-06-cv-02942)
District Judge: Hon. Joel A. Pisano
Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, SCIRICA and RENDELL, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: July 27, 2011 )
__________
OPINION
__________
McKEE, Chief Judge.
Robert Barefoot and Deonna Enterprises, Inc. appeal the district court’s grant of partial
summary judgment to Wellness Publishing, Holt M.D. Consulting, Inc., Nature’s Benefit, Inc.,
and Stephen Holt. For the reasons set forth below, we will affirm.
1
Because we write primarily for the parties, we need not repeat the facts or procedural
history of this case. Moreover, the district court has ably summarized the relevant background.
See Barefoot v. Wellness Publ’g, 2009 WL 4143110 (D.N.J. Nov. 17, 2009). On appeal,
Appellants argue that the district court erred when it granted summary judgment to Stephen Holt
and dismissed all claims against him.
In his detailed and thoughtful opinion, Judge Pisano carefully and clearly explained his
reasons for dismissing Holt from the lawsuit. See id. He reiterated these reasons in his opinion
and order denying Appellants’ motion for reconsideration. See Barefoot v. Wellness Publ’g,
2010 WL 893571 (D.N.J. Mar. 8, 2010). We can add little to Judge Pisano’s analysis and
discussion and we will therefore affirm the district court’s order for substantially the same
reasons as set forth in that opinion.
2