Greg Givens v. Mitch Tolson

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1198 GREG GIVENS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MITCH TOLSON; RICHARD A. HAYHURST; RICHARD M. ADAMS, SR.; JANE DOE I; JOHN DOE I, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00909-HEH) Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 1, 2011 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greg Givens, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Greg Givens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Givens v. Tolson, No. 3:10-cv-00909-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2