United States v. Jamal Mitchell

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6461 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMAL MITCHELL, a/k/a Boo, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00025-JCC-1) Submitted: July 28, 2011 Decided: August 2, 2011 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambers, 192 F.3d 374, 376 (3d Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. 1:02-cr- 00025-JCC-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2