IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-50425
Summary Calendar
SULEMA C. ESTRELLA;
JOSE ESTRELLA, III,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. SA-99-CV-1000-FB
--------------------
December 13, 2000
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Estrellas appeal the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to the defendants in this Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)
case. They first argue that the district court erred in
determining that their claim was barred by the statute of
limitations. The district court’s determination on this issue was
not erroneous, as the Estrellas failed to timely present their
administrative claim to the appropriate agency. See 28 U.S.C. §
2401(b).
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-50425
-2-
The Estrellas next argue that the district court erred in
determining that Dr. Washington was a Government employee for FTCA
purposes. The district court did not err, as Washington falls
under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 233(g). The Estrellas’ final
argument is that the case should have been remanded. This
contention is not meritorious. The case was properly removed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(2). The Estrellas have failed to
show that the district court erred in denying their motion to
remand and granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Consequently, the judgment of the lower court is AFFIRMED.