United States v. Vasquez-Areguin

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-20937 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GASPAR VASQUEZ-AREGUIN, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-145-1 -------------------- June 15, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Gaspar Vasquez-Areguin (“Vasquez”) appeals the 75-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Vasquez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-20937 2– 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Vasquez’s argument is foreclosed. Vasquez contends also that his indictment should have been dismissed because it failed to allege any general intent to enter the United States. Vasquez did not challenge the indictment in the district court; therefore, it is construed in favor of validity unless it was so defective that, by any reasonable construction, it failed to charge the offense of conviction. United States v. Threadgill, 172 F.3d 357, 373 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 871 (1999). Vasquez’s indictment “fairly imported that his reentry was a voluntary act” and satisfied the constitutional requirements of a valid indictment. United States v. Guzman-Ocampo, 236 F.3d 233, 236, 239 & n.13 (5th Cir. 2000). Vasquez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.