Yantis v. US Bureau of Prisons

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10077 Conference Calendar DANIEL KENT YANTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus U.S. BUREAU OF PRISONS; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SEAGONVILLE TEXAS; NFN CHILDS, Administrator; NFN BURSEY, Officer; NFN SALMON, Officer; NFN GUNDY, Officer; NFN ROBERTS, Counselor; RONALD G. THOMPSON, Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CV-805-P -------------------- August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Daniel Kent Yantis, federal prisoner No. 33991-077, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A (b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(b)(i). However, Yantis does not challenge the district court’s procedural rulings and he does not cite the record or offer any factual argument to explain why the district court allegedly erred in determining that his complaint was frivolous. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-10077 -2- 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Yantis’s appeal is thus without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal as frivolous by the district court each count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Yantis, therefore, has two "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Yantis that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.