IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10300
Summary Calendar
ROJELIO MORA MINJAREZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS; TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE -
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:99-CV-2445-H
--------------------
September 18, 2001
Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rojelio Mora Minjarez, Texas prisoner # 559456, appeals the
district court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit, which he raised under FED. R. CIV. P.
60(b)(1). Minjarez asserts that the district court erred in
dismissing his lawsuit as frivolous; that the court improperly
relied upon Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), to deny him
relief; that the district court had “misinterpreted” the basis of
his complaint; that Minjarez had forfeited his earned good-time
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-10300
-2-
credits without the benefit of a hearing; and that Minjarez had
been bound to mandatory supervision despite the fact that the
Texas law governing mandatory supervision was unconstitutional
and despite the fact that Minjarez had failed to sign the
contract allowing for such supervision. Minjarez has failed to
show that the district court abused its discretion in denying the
motion. See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Liljeberg Enter., Inc., 38
F.3d 1404, 1408 (5th Cir. 1994); Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi,
635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981). Consequently, the judgment of
the district court is AFFIRMED.
Minjarez has also filed a “Motion for Equitable Relief and
Damages.” This motion is DENIED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.