IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-40083
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEMELL Q. WELCH,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. L-00-CR-823-1
________________________________________
October 18, 2001
Before POLITZ, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jemell Q. Welch, appeals his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent
to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(C). He maintains that
the trial court’s failure to advise him of the consequences of a supervised release
revocation mandates the vacating of his guilty plea. Although Welch is correct that
the trial judge did not speak to the consequences of a supervised release revocation,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
neither the actual sentence imposed nor the “worst-case” scenario one might
envision exceeds the statutory maximum incarceration period of which he was
correctly advised.1 Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
1
United States v. Hekimain, 975 F.2d 1098 (5th Cir. 1992).
2