STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
FILED
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS December 11, 2013
RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
BETTY CARR, WIDOW OF OF WEST VIRGINIA
CLIFFORD W. CARR (DECEASED),
Claimant Below, Petitioner
vs.) No. 12-0344 (BOR Appeal No. 2045958)
(Claim No. 720045318)
WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF
INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Below, Respondent
and
ROYAL COAL COMPANY,
Employer Below, Respondent
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Petitioner Betty Carr, widow of Clifford W. Carr, pro se, appeals the decision of the West
Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. The West Virginia Office of Insurance
Commissioner, by Mary Rich Maloy, its attorney, filed a timely response.
This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated February 16, 2012, in
which the Board affirmed an April 25, 2011, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s June 3, 2009,
decision denying Mrs. Carr dependent’s benefits. The Court has carefully reviewed the records,
written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for
consideration.
This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure.
1
Mr. Clifford W. Carr worked as a coal miner for Royal Coal Company and was granted a
15% permanent partial disability award in 1973, based on his exposure to the hazards of
occupational pneumoconiosis. On May 1, 2008, Mr. Carr died. His death certificate listed the
cause of death as a cerebrovascular accident. Following his death, Mrs. Carr applied for
dependent’s benefits. The claims administrator denied her application based on the findings of
the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board. Dr. Oliver then issued a report, stating that the acuity
of the pleuro-pulmonic disease did contribute to Mr. Carr’s death. He further stated that Mr.
Carr’s chronic respiratory insufficiency began with exposure to coal and smoking. A hearing was
then conducted before the Office of Judges in which the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board
was asked to consider Mr. Carr’s death certificate, the report of Dr. Oliver, and Mr. Carr’s prior
permanent partial disability award for occupational pneumoconiosis. The Occupational
Pneumoconiosis Board testified that Mr. Carr died as a combined result of a number of chronic
ailments including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and recurrent infections. But the
Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board found that none of the conditions that contributed to Mr.
Carr’s death were caused by occupational pneumoconiosis. The Occupational Pneumoconiosis
Board testified that Mr. Carr may have had occupational pneumoconiosis but the evidence did
not demonstrate that it was a material contributing factor in his death. On April 25, 2011, the
Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s denial of Mrs. Carr’s application for
dependent benefits. The Board of Review then affirmed the Order of the Office of Judges on
February 16, 2012, leading Mrs. Carr to appeal.
The Office of Judges concluded that it could not be determined that occupational
pneumoconiosis was a contributing factor in Mr. Carr’s death. The Office of Judges based its
opinion on the findings and testimony of the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board. The Office of
Judges found that Mr. Carr had numerous health problems at the time of his death. The Office of
Judges found that Dr. Oliver did not make a diagnosis of occupational pneumoconiosis and did
not find that occupational pneumoconiosis was a material, contributing factor in Mr. Carr’s
death. The Office of Judges also found that Mr. Carr’s prior 15% permanent partial disability
award was not sufficient to demonstrate that occupational pneumoconiosis was a material,
contributing factor in his death. The Office of Judges therefore found that Mrs. Carr was not
entitled to dependent benefits from Mr. Carr’s death. The Board of Review adopted the findings
of the Office of Judges and affirmed its Order.
We agree with the conclusions of the Board of Review and the findings of the Office of
Judges. Mrs. Carr has not demonstrated that she is entitled to dependent benefits based on her
husband’s death. Mrs. Carr has not presented sufficient evidence to show that occupational
pneumoconiosis contributed in any material degree to Mr. Carr’s death. Bradford v. Workers’
Comp. Comm’r, 185 W. Va. 434, 442, 408 S.E.2d 13, 21 (1991).
For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
2
Affirmed.
ISSUED: December 11, 2013
CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Brent D. Benjamin
Justice Robin J. Davis
Justice Margaret L. Workman
Justice Menis E. Ketchum
Justice Allen H. Loughry II
3