NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
AND
OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC
(doing business as Otterbox),
Intervenor.
______________________
2013-1230
______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-780.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
TERRY L. CLARK, Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, of Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellant.
PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General
Counsel, United States International Trade Commission,
of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the
brief were PAUL R. BARDOS, Acting General Counsel, and
SIDNEY A. ROSENWEIG, Acting Assistant General Counsel.
Of counsel was WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Attorney.
LOUIS S. MASTRIANI, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaum-
berg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor.
With him on the brief were DANIEL F. SMITH and EVAN H.
LANGDON.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court