FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 20 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAURICIO BELTRAN, No. 12-73018
Petitioner, Agency No. A094-177-824
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 17, 2013**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Mauricio Beltran, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen
alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Avagyan v. Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 674 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny the petition for
review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Beltran’s motion to reopen
as untimely where he filed it three years after his 2008 final order of removal, see 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to establish that he qualified for equitable
tolling of the filing deadline, see Avagyan, 646 F.3d at 679-80 (equitable tolling is
available to a petitioner who establishes that he suffered from deception, fraud or
error, and exercised due diligence in discovering such circumstances). The
evidence is insufficient to establish diligence between the time Beltran hired his
second attorney in 2008 and the time he filed the motion in 2011.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 12-73018