United States v. Richard Valdez

FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEC 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10424

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00128-PMP

v.
MEMORANDUM*
RICHARD VALDEZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2013**

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Richard Valdez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 110-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a

felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and

924(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Valdez’s

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Valdez the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Valdez has waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review

of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no

arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582

F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at

988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 12-10424