United States v. Juan Juarez-Lozano

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 03 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10154 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01365-DCB v. MEMORANDUM* JUAN JUAREZ-LOZANO, a.k.a. Juan Juarez-Losano, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 17, 2013** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Juan Juarez-Lozano appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Juarez-Lozano contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the five-month sentence he received for a prior immigration offense, his motivations for returning, the cost to the taxpayers of incarcerating him, and the impact the sentence will have on his family. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Juarez-Lozano’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Notwithstanding the length of Juarez-Lozano’s previous sentence, his current sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Juarez-Lozano’s criminal and immigration history. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 13-10154