NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
IN RE AFFINITY LABS OF TEXAS, LLC
______________________
2013-1393
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination
No. 95/001,263.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CYRUS A. MORTON, Robins, Kaplan, Miller, and Ciresi,
L.L.P., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for appellant.
Of counsel on the brief was TIMOTHY G. NEWMAN, Larson
Newman, LLP, of Austin, Texas.
SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor, Office of
the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office,
of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor Commis-
sioner for Patents. With him on the brief were NATHAN K.
KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Asso-
ciate Solicitor.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 9, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court