Edward M. Goodman & Bernice S. Goodman, Res. v. Michael J. Goodman & Mary F. Goodman, Apps.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE EDWARD M. GOODMAN and No. 68416-7-1 BERNICE S. GOODMAN, husband and wife, Respondents, MICHAEL J. GOODMAN and ORDER DENYING MOTION MARY F. GOODMAN, husband and FOR RECONSIDERATION, wife, CHANGING AND REPLACING Appellants. OPINION Appellants Michael and Mary Goodman filed a motion for reconsideration of the court's opinion filed November 25, 2013. The panel has determined that the motion should be denied but that the opinion should be changed and replaced as noted below. Now therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that on page 3, n.2: Delete the phrase "it was not admitted at trial" in the sentence beginning "But Michael." It is further ORDERED that on page 7, add a footnote to the last sentence in the first paragraph ending with "Lot 2." The footnote shall read, "Without relevant authority or compelling argument, Michael claims that the Shoreline Management Act precludes the trial court from finding an implied easement in this case. In the absence of meaningful authority, Michael does not establish grounds for any relief based on the Shoreline Management Act. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. Boslev, 118 Wn.2d 801, 809, 828 No. 68416-7-1 Order Granting Motion for Reconsideration, Changing and Replacing Opinion P.2d 549 (1992) (court need not address arguments unsupported by relevant authority)." It is further ORDERED that the amended opinion shall replace the original opinion filed herein. Dated this _t2_ day of January, 2014. fiu <°/ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE EDWARD M. GOODMAN and No. 68416-7- o BERNICE S. GOODMAN, husband r-a c=> coo —IC and wife, x- c_ .,T1 ^ ^ i Respondents, -*— in—* . *"^ ,..~ CO i!?-o(- cnr^r 3P= ^2?- 3>- =?«"" s MICHAEL J. GOODMAN and UNPUBLISHED OPINION XT '"^ «*c MARY F. GOODMAN, husband and