NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 24 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
CORY NAROG, No. 11-18048
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-03265-JAM-
CKD
v.
NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK, a MEMORANDUM*
New York State Chartered Bank; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 15, 2014**
San Francisco, California
Before: BYBEE and BEA, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge.***
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
***
The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge for the U.S. Court of
International Trade, sitting by designation.
Appellant Cory Narog appeals the district court’s grant of Appellees’
motions to dismiss. For the following reasons, we affirm.
1. Narog did not address the district court’s holding in favor of Trustee
Corps in his opening brief, which constitutes waiver. Christian Legal Soc. Chapter
of Univ. of Cal. v. Wu, 626 F.3d 483, 485 (9th Cir. 2010). The district court’s
ruling as to Trustee Corps is affirmed.
2. The district court did not err when it found that Narog failed to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted against Appellant Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation, because he failed to allege an equitable claim based on
prejudicial interference with his right of reinstatement. Lona v. Citibank, N.A., 134
Cal. Rptr. 3d 622, 633 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011). The exhibits attached to Narog’s
complaint show that, notwithstanding a typographical error in the address, the
statutory notices were sent in compliance with the relevant statutes. The court
could consider such documents attached to the complaint on the 12(b)(6) motion.
Parks Sch. of Bus., Inc. v. Symington, 51 F.3d 1480, 1484 (9th Cir. 1995). Narog
cannot overcome the presumption of regularity that accompanied the sale, see
Residential Capital v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp., 134 Cal. Rptr. 2d 162
(Cal. Ct. App. 2003), and therefore has not alleged a cause of action in his fourth
amended complaint. Accordingly, we need not and do not address whether a
2
complaint that correctly alleged interference with the right to reinstatement would
also fail to state a claim without an allegation of full tender.
AFFIRMED.
3