UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2232
In re: ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his complaint. He seeks an order from this court directing
the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court has recently dismissed
his complaint. Accordingly, because the district court has
recently decided Hairston’s case, we deny the mandamus petition
as moot. We further deny Hairston’s motion to waive fees. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2