United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 13-1930
___________________________
Sandra H. Harp
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Navarre Logistical Services, Inc.; David Ginsberg; Margot McManus; Micki St.
Clair, as agents for Navarre Logistical Services, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: January 29, 2014
Filed: February 7, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Sandra Harp appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her pro se action claiming that her former employer terminated her based
on her race, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Upon careful de
novo review, see Olsen v. Capital Region Med. Ctr., 713 F.3d 1149, 1153 (8th Cir.
2013), we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment because
the admissible evidence before the court would not permit a factfinder to conclude that
defendants’ proffered reason for firing Harp was pretextual. See Twymon v. Wells
Fargo & Co., 462 F.3d 925, 935 (8th Cir. 2006) (plaintiff failed to show proffered
reason for termination was pretext where she did not assert that employer did not
honestly believe she was accountable for violations of policy when it fired her for
those violations).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Patrick J. Schiltz, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L.
Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
-2-