UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2290
In Re: ARTHUR RODGERS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:13-cv-02902-CCB)
Submitted: February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014
Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur Rodgers, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Arthur Rodgers petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in
processing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action and
in adjudicating his motion for injunctive relief. He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. Our
review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district
court has both denied the motion for a preliminary injunction
and dismissed Rodgers’ complaint. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Rodgers’ case, the mandamus
petition, as amended, is moot, and we deny it on that basis. We
grant Rodgers’ request for leave to file an out-of-time
supplement to his mandamus petition. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2