UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1878
MARCELO BLADIMIR SOL-FLORES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: March 18, 2014 Decided: March 27, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Amanda Bethea Keaveny, THE LAW OFFICE OF AMANDA BETHEA KEAVENY,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery,
Assistant Attorney General, Cindy Ferrier, Assistant Director,
Tracie N. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marcelo Bladimir Sol-Flores, a native and citizen of
El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the
immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum,
withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention
Against Torture. * We have thoroughly reviewed the record,
including the transcript of Sol-Flores’ merits hearing and all
supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does
not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative
factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v.
Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Sol-Flores (B.I.A. June
13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
*
Sol-Flores has failed to raise any challenges to the
denial of his request for protection under the Convention
Against Torture. He has therefore waived appellate review of
this claim. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7
(4th Cir. 2004).
2