People v. Webster CA1/1

Filed 3/28/14 P. v. Webster CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A139413 v. EZEKIEL WEBSTER, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. SC077684) Defendant and Appellant. Defendant pled no contest to a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11379 and admitted prior convictions. He was sentenced to four years in state prison. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal, and appellate counsel was appointed to represent him. Appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), in which he raises no issue for appeal and asks this court for an independent review of the record. (See also People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 124 (Kelly).) Counsel attests that defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief. We have received no such brief. We have examined the entire record in accordance with Wende. We conclude that no arguable issue exists on appeal and affirm. Procedural and Factual Background On January 24, 2013, the San Mateo County District Attorney’s Office filed a felony complaint alleging that defendant had violated Health and Safety Code section 11352 (count 1), and that he had violated Health and Safety Code section 11379 (count 2). Defendant was also alleged to have had three prior convictions, a violation of Health 1 and Safety Code section 11351.5, a violation of Penal Code sections, 245, subdivision (a)(1), and 422. On June 21, 2013, defendant executed a change of plea form and pleaded no contest to count 2, a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11379. In addition, defendant admitted that he had previously been convicted of a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11351.5, and a violation of Penal Code section 422. All remaining counts were dismissed pursuant to a negotiated plea. Defendant waived his right to a probation report, and on August 2, 2013, the trial court sentenced him to the low term of two years on count 2. The trial court doubled this term pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(1) for a total of four years in state prison. The court awarded defendant 74 days of actual credit and 74 days of conduct credit for a total of 148 days of presentence credits. The court ordered defendant to submit blood and saliva samples, pay a $280 restitution fine, and other miscellaneous fines. Defendant was also ordered to register as a narcotics offender. Disposition Defendant was at all times represented by competent counsel who ably protected his rights and interests. We find no indication in the record counsel provided ineffective assistance. There was no error in the sentencing process or the sentence. The court has reviewed the entire record in accordance with Wende, and finds no arguable issues requiring further briefing. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. 2 ______________________ Becton, J.* We concur: ______________________ Margulies, Acting P.J. ______________________ Banke, J. * Judge of the Contra Costa County Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. 3