UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
___________________________________
)
INTEX RECREATION CORPORATION, )
)
Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 04-1785 (PLF)
)
TEAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION, )
)
Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. )
___________________________________ )
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, it is hereby
ORDERED that [212] plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation’s (“Intex”) Motion
for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement is GRANTED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that [211] defendant Team Worldwide Corporation’s
Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement is DENIED; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered for Intex on Claim I of Intex’s
Amended Complaint; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered for Intex on Claim I of Team
Worldwide Corporation’s Counterclaim; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLARES that Intex’s products
containing or incorporating pumps with pump model numbers 619RW and 619RL and pumps of
like structure DO NOT INFRINGE Claims 14 through 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,793,469 B2; it is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DECLARES that Intex’s products
containing or incorporating pumps with pump model numbers AP619, 639, and 626R and pumps
of like structure DO NOT INFRINGE Claims 14 through 17 of U.S. Patent No. 6,793,469 B2;
and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 28, 2014, Intex shall show cause
as to why Claim II (patent invalidity) of Intex’s Amended Complaint should not be dismissed for
lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
SO ORDERED.
/s/_______________________________
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN
DATE: March 10, 2014 United States District Judge
2