IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-60701
Conference Calendar
EDWARD DANIEL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
UNKNOWN BRADLEY, Warden; UNKNOWN SCOTT, Counselor;
WARDEN HUGHES, Assistant Warden; UNKNOWN BUIE, Officer,
Defendants-Appellees.
_____________________________________________________
EDWARD DANIEL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
JODY BRADLEY; KNEZIE HUGHES, also known as Unknown Hughes;
O. BUIE, also known as Unknown Buie; LEON PERRY; WILLIE
O. SCOTT, Counselor,
Defendants-Appellees.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 5:99-CV-41-Brs
No. 5:99-CV-4-Brs
--------------------
February 21, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Edward Daniel (“Daniel”), Mississippi state prisoner
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 00-60701
-2-
# 42550, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 civil rights complaint. Daniel challenges the credibility
determinations of the magistrate judge, and he argues that
the district court dismissed his complaint because he is
incarcerated.
This court does not re-evaluate the credibility of
witnesses. See Williams v. Fab-Con, Inc., 990 F.2d 228, 230 (5th
Cir. 1993); see also Martin v. Thomas, 973 F.2d 449, 453 n.3 (5th
Cir. 1992). Daniel’s argument that the district court dismissed
his complaint because he is incarcerated lacks merit because the
district court did not dismiss Daniel’s complaint because of his
incarceration.
AFFIRMED.