FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JUN - 5 2009
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk, U.S. District and
Bankruptcy Courts
Faraud K. Muhammad, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 09 1046
)
The Governor to the CIA of Illinois et al. )
)
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has submitted seven complaints each accompanied by an
application to proceed in forma pauperis. In each complaint, plaintiff sues "secret CIA" agents
and in five complaints he adds "[t]he Governor to the CIA of Illinois" and officers of the
DeKalb, Illinois, police department. Because the Court will dispose of the seven complaints in
the same manner, it will consolidate them into one civil action, grant plaintiff s in forma
pauperis application and dismiss the case as frivolous. I
Plaintiff is a homeless individual in the District of Columbia. He accuses the defendants
of various misdeeds, including poisoning him with toxic material and transferring "certain [of
his] brainwave frequencies" to CIA headquarters and the basement of the DeKalb police
department to monitor his activities. Complaints that describe fantastic or delusional scenarios
are subject to immediate dismissal. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989); Best v.
I In proceedings where leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, the Court must
"dismiss the case at any time [it] determines that ... the action ... is frivolous." 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). In addition to "The Governor to the CIA of Illinois" and the DeKalb police
department, the named defendants, as consolidated, are: "Secret CIA Agents" Mariah, Star, Al
Ousli, Tim Bowden, Stephanie Knudson, John Muhammad, Elois D. Harris, Medinah Harris,
Mecca Muhammad, Naoki Harris, Nadar Muhammad, Vekie Harris, B Littlejohn, Sharon
Littlejohn, Tina Harris, Tiffany Harris and Ericka Littlejohn and Police Officers Melissa
Hernandez, Tim Moore and Lt. Dan Gerace.
Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Moreover, a complaint may be dismissed as
frivolous when it lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v. District of Columbia Bd.
of Parole, 734 F.2d 56, 59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Because each consolidated complaint qualifies for
such treatment, the Court will dismiss the case by separate Order issued contemporaneously.
Date: May ~, 2009
-2-