United States v. David Kates

Case: 13-11082 Document: 00512592107 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/10/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-11082 April 10, 2014 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff−Appellee, versus DAVID EARL KATES, Defendant−Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:13-CV-169 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Kates, federal prisoner # 30428-077, was convicted by a jury of * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-11082 Document: 00512592107 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/10/2014 No. 13-11082 possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine base and was sentenced to 360 months of imprisonment. See United States v. Kates, 174 F.3d 580, 581-84 (5th Cir. 1999). On February 8, 2012, in No. 2:12-CV-0018, the district court entered the following order: DAVID EARL KATES is BARRED FROM FILING FURTHER ACTIONS, MOTIONS, OR PLEADINGS OF ANY KIND ON THE DIS- TRICT COURT LEVEL WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING WRITTEN JUDICIAL PERMISSION. Any future pleadings in violation of this BAR will be stricken and will receive no ruling from the Court. On September 10, 2013, Kates filed a “First Amendment Petition” seek- ing to overturn his conviction and sentence because the facts supporting his career-offender sentencing enhancement were not presented to the jury. On September 24, 2013, the district court, in accordance with the standing sanc- tion, ordered that this pleading “is STRICKEN and will receive no ruling from the Court.” Kates has not shown that this was an abuse of discretion. See Balawajder v. Scott, 160 F.3d 1066, 1067-68 (5th Cir. 1998); see also Gelabert v. Lynaugh, 894 F.2d 746, 747-48 (5th Cir. 1990). AFFIRMED. 2