Sunil Basnet v. Eric Holder, Jr.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT APR 21 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SUNIL BASNET, No. 10-71687 Petitioner, Agency No. A088-870-125 v. MEMORANDUM* ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted April 10, 2014** Seattle, Washington Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and RAWLINSON and BEA, Circuit Judges. Sunil Basnet filed an untimely application for asylum and did not satisfy his burden to show extraordinary or changed circumstances. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a). Basnet also failed to demonstrate eligibility for asylum by establishing persecution * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). on account of a protected ground. See Garcia-Milian v. Holder, No. 09-71461, —F.3d—, 2014 WL 555138, at *4 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2014), as amended. Because “[a]n applicant who fails to satisfy the standard of proof for asylum also fails to satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of removal,” Basnet’s challenge to the denial of his request for withholding also fails. Id. at *5 n.4 (citation omitted). Because Basnet failed to argue his Convention Against Torture claim in his opening brief, that claim is waived. See Wagner v. Cnty. of Maricopa, No. 10-15501, —F.3d—, 2013 WL 7219510, at *11 (9th Cir. Dec. 30, 2013), as amended, (citation omitted). PETITION DENIED. Page 2 of 2