NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC,
Appellants,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,
Appellee,
AND
APPLE INC.,
Intervenor.
______________________
2013-1519
______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade
Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-794.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart &
Sullivan, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for
appellants. With him on the brief were KEVIN P. JOHNSON
and VICTORIA F. MAROULIS, of Redwood Shores, Califor-
nia; ALAN L. WHITEHURST, DEREK L. SHAFFER and
MARISSA R. DUCCA, of Washington, DC; and THOMAS D.
PEASE, of New York, New York. Of counsel were
WILLIAM ADAMS and KATHLEEN M. SULLIVAN of New York,
New York; PAUL F. BRINKMAN and SCOTT A. LASHER, of
Washington, DC, and ROBERT JASON BECHER, of Los
Angeles, California.
CLARK S. CHENEY, Attorney, Office of General Coun-
sel, United States International Trade Commission, of
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the
brief were DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, General Counsel, and
WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Assistant General Counsel.
WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and
Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for interve-
nor. With him on the brief were RICHARD W. O’NEILL and
JOSEPH J. MUELLER; MARK D. SELWYN, of Palo Alto, Cali-
fornia; JAMES L. QUARLES III, NINA S. TALLON and
GREGORY H. LANTIER, of Washington, DC; and JAMES M.
DOWD, of Los Angeles, California. Of counsel were MARK
C. FLEMING and LAUREN B. FLETCHER, of Boston, Massa-
chusetts.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 14, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court