FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAY 19 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WARNER BONILLA-LOPEZ, a.k.a. No. 12-73379
Wilver Bonilla,
Agency No. A200-248-291
Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM*
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 13, 2014**
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Warner Bonilla-Lopez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual
findings, Arbid v. Holder, 700 F.3d 379, 385-86 (9th Cir. 2012), and we deny the
petition for review.
Bonilla-Lopez does not challenge the agency’s dispositive finding that he
was convicted of a particularly serious crime. Accordingly, Bonilla-Lopez’s
asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See id. at 385.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Bonilla-Lopez failed to establish that it is more likely than not he will be tortured
by or with the acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See Silaya v.
Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 12-73379