Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 326
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION I
No. CR-13-649
Opinion Delivered May 21, 2014
BRANDY MICHELLE GOODMAN APPEAL FROM THE LONOKE
APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
[NO. CR-08-207]
V.
HONORABLE BARBARA ELMORE,
STATE OF ARKANSAS JUDGE
APPELLEE
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD AND
ADDENDUM ORDERED; MOTION
TO WITHDRAW DENIED
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
Appellant Brandy Goodman’s probation was revoked on the underlying charge of
endangering the welfare of a minor after the trial court found that she had violated the terms
and conditions of her probation. She was sentenced to two years in the Community
Correction Center. Pursuant to Anders v. California1 and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-
3(k), Goodman’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw on the grounds that an appeal would
be wholly without merit. Goodman was notified of her right to file pro se points for reversal;
1
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 326
however, she has not done so. We order a supplemental record and addendum, and deny
counsel’s motion to withdraw.2
Although Goodman’s probation for endangering the welfare of a minor was the subject
of the State’s revocation petition, the sentencing order for that offense is not included in the
record. If anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or accident,
we may direct that the omission or misstatement be corrected, and if necessary, that a
supplemental record be certified and transmitted.3 Because the sentencing order for the
underlying charge is material, we order that the record be supplemented. Goodman has thirty
days from today to file a supplemental record with this court. After the record is
supplemented, the addendum will also need to be supplemented to include the missing
sentencing order.
Supplemental record and addendum ordered; motion to withdraw denied.
GLADWIN, C.J., and VAUGHT, J., agree.
The Lane Firm, by: Jonathan T. Lane, for appellant.
No response.
2
This is the second time this case has been before us. We originally denied counsel’s
motion to withdraw and ordered rebriefing due to deficiencies in the brief. Goodman v. State,
2014 Ark. App. 45.
3
Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e) (made applicable to criminal cases by Ark. R. App.
P.–Crim. 4(a)); Hadley v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 536.
2