Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 350
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION II
No. CR-13-1012
Opinion Delivered June 4, 2014
DENARIUS A. MARTIN
APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CRITTENDEN
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
V. [NO. CR-2008-459]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE RANDY F.
APPELLEE PHILHOURS, JUDGE
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO
WITHDRAW GRANTED
BILL H. WALMSLEY, Judge
On June 30, 2008, appellant Denarius Martin pleaded guilty to burglary, and he
received five years’ probation and was ordered to pay restitution, fines, fees, and costs. On
April 22, 2013, the State filed a petition to revoke his probation alleging, among other things,
that Martin failed to make any payments toward what he owed. The Crittenden County
Circuit Court found that Martin had violated the terms and conditions of his probation and,
upon revocation, sentenced him to two years in a regional correctional facility followed by
seven years’ suspended imposition of sentence. Defense counsel has filed a motion to
withdraw on the basis that there is no merit to an appeal.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Rule 4-3(k) of the Rules
of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, defense counsel’s motion was
accompanied by a brief that purports to address all adverse rulings with an explanation why
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 350
each ruling is not a meritorious ground for reversal. Martin was provided with a copy of
counsel’s brief and notified of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Martin has not filed
any points.
From our review of the record and the briefs presented to us, we agree with defense
counsel that there is no merit to an appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the order of revocation and
grant defense counsel’s motion to withdraw.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
HARRISON and WYNNE, JJ., agree.
C. Brian Williams, for appellant.
No response.
2