FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 7 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
YOUNGSOO S. LEE, No. 12-56102
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-05136-R-AGR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP; et
al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 25, 2014**
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Youngsoo S. Lee appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his
action arising from foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion brought
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS,
Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Lee’s Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b) motion predicated on newly discovered evidence because Lee failed to
establish grounds for such relief. See id. at 1263 (setting forth grounds for
reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)).
Lee’s contentions regarding the Securities Act of 1933 are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
2 12-56102