United States v. Eduardo Martinez-Gloria

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 10 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-10126 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:12-cr-01867-RCC- HCE-1 v. EDUARDO MARTINEZ-GLORIA, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Raner C. Collins, Chief District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 22, 2014** Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges. Eduardo Martinez-Gloria appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 50-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Martinez-Gloria’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Martinez-Gloria the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Martinez-Gloria has waived his right to appeal his conviction and 50-month sentence. Because the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED.