State of New York
Supreme Court, Appellate Division
Third Judicial Department
Decided and Entered: July 24, 2014 517135
________________________________
In the Matter of the Claim of
JOSEPH MAIORANO,
Appellant,
v
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALMAN PLUMBING et al.,
Respondents.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD,
Respondent.
________________________________
Calendar Date: May 30, 2014
Before: Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Lynch and Clark, JJ.
__________
Law Offices of Joseph Romano, Yonkers (Anthony Brooks-
Morgese of counsel), for appellant.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Iris
A. Steel of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board,
respondent.
__________
Clark, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board,
filed October 30, 2012, which, among other things, denied
claimant's request for a change of venue.
Claimant applied for workers' compensation benefits,
alleging that he was injured during the course of his employment
as a plumber in New York City. Although claimant resides in
Brooklyn, he requested that hearings on his claim be held in the
City of White Plains, Westchester County on the ground that it
-2- 517135
was "the most convenient location." A Workers' Compensation Law
Judge denied the request. Upon review, the Workers' Compensation
Board affirmed and assessed costs of $500 against claimant's
counsel pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a (3) (ii).
Claimant now appeals.
We affirm. The Chair of the Board has controlling
authority to designate the location of hearings (see Workers'
Compensation Law § 141; 12 NYCRR 300.7 [b]; Matter of Toledo v
Administration for Children Servs., 112 AD3d 1209, 1210 [2013]).
The Chair issued a policy indicating that hearings are generally
to be scheduled "in the district where the claimant resides."
Here, inasmuch as claimant failed to articulate a reasonable
basis justifying a change of venue outside of his residential
district, we will not disturb the Board's decision (see Matter of
Toledo v Administration for Children Servs., 112 AD3d at 1210).
Regarding the assessment of costs, we have upheld the Board's
imposition of a penalty pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law
§ 114-a (3) (ii) when, as here, substantial evidence supports its
determination that a change of venue request was made absent a
reasonable basis (see id.; 112 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Wolfe v
New York City Dept. of Corr., 112 AD3d 1197, 1198 [2013]; Matter
of Banton v New York City Dept. of Corr., 112 AD3d 1195, 1196-
1197 [2013]). Claimant's remaining arguments, to the extent that
they are properly before us, have been considered and found to be
without merit.
Stein, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Lynch, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court