FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 01 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIO LEANOS; OLGA LEANOS, No. 12-56383
Plaintiffs - Appellants, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-07541-JAK-SS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK FA,
Defendant,
And
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA;
CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 22, 2014**
Before: GOODWIN, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Mario and Olga Leanos appeal pro se from the district court’s order
dismissing their action against their mortgage lender and other private parties
alleging constitutional violations and various federal and state law claims. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a
dismissal for failure to comply with an order to amend the complaint. McHenry v.
Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 1996). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing plaintiffs’ action
for failure to comply with the court’s order to file an amended complaint because
plaintiffs failed to file an amended complaint, despite being afforded ample time to
do so and being warned that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of their
action. See id. at 1177-78; see also Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43
(9th Cir. 2002) (discussing factors relevant to dismissal for failure to comply with
a court order).
AFFIRMED.
2 12-56383