[Cite as Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 123 Ohio St.3d 87, 2009-Ohio-4081.]
MILLER, APPELLANT, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
& CORRECTION ET AL., APPELLEES.
[Cite as Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.,
123 Ohio St.3d 87, 2009-Ohio-4081.]
Appeal from dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus — Res judicata
bars petitioner from filing a successive habeas corpus petition —
Judgment affirmed.
(No. 2009-0555 — Submitted August 11, 2009 — Decided August 19, 2009.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County,
No. 08-BE-35, 2009-Ohio-697.
__________________
Per Curiam.
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the
petition of appellant, Timothy A. Miller, for a writ of habeas corpus. Miller
previously filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus that raised the same issues
as in this petition. Miller v. Eberlin, 116 Ohio St.3d 1434, 2007-Ohio-6518, 877
N.E.2d 987. Res judicata barred Miller from filing a successive habeas corpus
petition. Amstutz v. Eberlin, 119 Ohio St.3d 421, 2008-Ohio-4538, 894 N.E.2d
1219, ¶ 7.
Judgment affirmed.
MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,
O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
__________________
Timothy A. Miller, pro se.
Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Jerri L. Fosnaught, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellees.
______________________