[Cite as Williams v. Williams, 2013-Ohio-5156.]
COURT OF APPEALS
STARK COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
KELLY WILLIAMS : JUDGES:
: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J.
Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
: Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
-vs- :
:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS : Case No. 2013CA00093
:
Defendant-Appellant : OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common
Pleas, Family Court Division, Case
No. 2007 DR 00295
JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded
DATE OF JUDGMENT: November 18, 2013
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
DAVID E. BUTZ GERALD B. GOLUB
4774 Munson Street, NW 1340 Market Avenue, North
P.O. Box 36963 Suite 1
Canton, OH 44735-6963 Canton, OH 44714
Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00093 2
Farmer, P.J.
{¶1} On September 30, 2000, appellant, Michael Williams, and appellee, Kelly
Williams, were married. Three children were born of the marriage. On March 8, 2007,
appellee filed a complaint for divorce. By decree of divorce filed January 3, 2008, the
parties were granted a divorce. Incorporated into the decree was the parties' shared
parenting plan which provided for a deviation from the child support guidelines, requiring
appellant to pay $180.00 per month per child or $540.00 per month. The parties filed
another shared parenting plan on February 23, 2009 containing the same child support
amount.
{¶2} On September 18, 2012, an administrative hearing on the issue of child
support was held upon appellant's request. In a report filed September 28, 2012, the
hearing officer recommended the modification of child support to $1,199.08 per month
with insurance or $1,200.04 per month plus a cash medical of $189.83 per month
without insurance. Appellant filed objections.
{¶3} A hearing before a magistrate was held on January 10, 2013. By
judgment entry filed January 25, 2013, the magistrate deviated from the child support
guidelines, ordering appellant to pay child support in the amount of $854.00 per month
with insurance or $786.47 per month plus a cash medical of $188.00 per month without
insurance. Appellee filed objections.
{¶4} A hearing before the trial court was held on April 12, 2013. By judgment
entry filed April 22, 2013, the trial court corrected the magistrate's decision on the
calculation of the deviation only, and ordered appellant to pay child support in the
Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00093 3
amount of $924.43 per month with insurance or $873.36 per month plus a cash medical
of $212.58 per month without insurance.
{¶5} Appellant filed an appeal and this matter is now before this court for
consideration. Assignments of error are as follows:
I
{¶6} "THE COURT ERRED IN NOT ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE'S
DECISION OF JANUARY 25, 2013 WHICH WAS NOT REQUIRED TO ENUMERATE
FINDING OF EVERY FACTOR FOR A DEVIATION OF THE AMOUNT OF CHILD
SUPPORT TO BE PAID AND BY NOT PROPERLY TAKING INTO CONSIDERATION
ALL FACTORS CONSIDERED."
II
{¶7} "THE COURT ERRED IN NOT COMPLYING WITH SECTION 3119.24
OHIO REVISED CODE BY NOT MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE AMOUNT
OF CHILD SUPPORT WOULD BE UNJUST OR INAPPROPRIATE AND WOULD NOT
BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, AND FINDINGS OF FACT
SUPPORTING ITS DETERMINATION."
II
{¶8} We shall address Assignment of Error II first as it is dispositive of the
appeal. Appellant claims the trial court erred in failing to comply with R.C. 3119.24. We
agree.
{¶9} In its judgment entry filed April 22, 2013, the trial court found and ordered
the following, respectively:
Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00093 4
The Magistrate found that there was no change of circumstances
except the increase in Defendant's income. The child support guideline
worksheet is correct as presented but has no deviation calculation.
Therefore the Court should have used the same deviation calculation as
previously agreed to, and used, by the parties. This calculation is as
follows: $15,280.34 - $4,187.20 = $11,093.14 / 12 = $924.43. There
should be no deviation of the cash medical as the justification for the
deviation in part relies on health insurance provided by father.
The Magistrate's Decision is corrected for the calculation of the
deviation only. The Objection granted in part. Defendant ordered to pay
child support in the amount of $924.43 per month total for the three
children, plus processing fees with insurance, and $873.36 per month total
plus process fees, without insurance. Cash medical ordered at $212.58
plus processing fees. All remaining portions of the Magistrate decision are
affirmed. It is so ordered.
{¶10} Both the magistrate and the trial court granted a deviation from the child
support guidelines. The magistrate based his decision on the "abbreviated worksheet"
attached to his judgment entry, whereas the trial court employed a deviation calculation
as previously agreed to by the parties in their original shared parenting plan.
{¶11} R.C. 3119.24 governs child support under shared parenting orders and
states the following in pertinent part:
Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00093 5
(A)(1) A court that issues a shared parenting order in accordance
with section 3109.04 of the Revised Code shall order an amount of child
support to be paid under the child support order that is calculated in
accordance with the schedule and with the worksheet set forth in section
3119.022 of the Revised Code, through the line establishing the actual
annual obligation, except that, if that amount would be unjust or
inappropriate to the children or either parent and would not be in the best
interest of the child because of the extraordinary circumstances of the
parents or because of any other factors or criteria set forth in section
3119.23 of the Revised Code, the court may deviate from that amount.
(2) The court shall consider extraordinary circumstances and other
factors or criteria if it deviates from the amount described in division (A)(1)
of this section and shall enter in the journal the amount described in
division (A)(1) of this section its determination that the amount would be
unjust or inappropriate and would not be in the best interest of the child,
and findings of fact supporting its determination.
{¶12} Neither the magistrate nor the trial court stated with particularity the
reasons for the deviation. Although it might be argued that the original shared parenting
plan is sufficient, we find given the change of circumstances, it is not. The matter is
reversed and remanded for findings under R.C. 3119.24.
{¶13} Assignment of Error II is granted.
Stark County, Case No. 2013CA00093 6
I
{¶14} This assignment challenges the trial court's determination on the amount
of child support. Based upon our reversal and remand in Assignment of Error II, this
assignment is moot.
{¶15} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio,
Family Court Division is hereby reversed and the matter is remanded to said court for
findings under R.C. 3119.24.
By Farmer, P.J.
Wise, J. and
Baldwin, J. concur.
_______________________________
Hon. Sheila G. Farmer
_______________________________
Hon. John W. Wise
_______________________________
Hon. Craig R. Baldwin
SGF/sg 116
[Cite as Williams v. Williams, 2013-Ohio-5156.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR STARK COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
KELLY WILLIAMS :
:
Plaintiff-Appellee :
:
-vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY
:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS :
:
Defendant-Appellant : CASE NO. 2013CA00093
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the
judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio, Family Court Division is
reversed and the matter is remanded to said court for findings under R.C. 3119.24.
Costs to appellee.
_______________________________
Hon. Sheila G. Farmer
_______________________________
Hon. John W. Wise
_______________________________
Hon. Craig R. Baldwin