[Cite as Turnmire v. Ostrowski, 2013-Ohio-5154.]
COURT OF APPEALS
STARK COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JOHN TURNMIRE : JUDGES:
: Hon. Sheila G. Farmer, P.J.
Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
: Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J.
-vs- :
:
AMELIA OSTROWSKI, AKA : Case Nos. 2013CA00042
AMELIA DIGIANTONIA : 2013CA00099
:
Defendant-Appellant : OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Court of Common
Pleas, Family Court Division, Case
No. 2011JCV01658
JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded
DATE OF JUDGMENT: November 18, 2013
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
ARNOLD F. GLANTZ CRAIG T. CONLEY
4883 Dressler Road, NW 604 Huntington Plaza
Canton, OH 44718 220 Market Avenue, South
Canton, OH 44702
Stark County, Case Nos. 2013CA00042 & 2012CA00099 2
Farmer, P.J.
{¶1} Appellant, Amelia Ostrowski aka Amelia Digiantonia, and appellee, John
Turnmire, had a child together on September 23, 2003. On December 13, 2011,
appellee filed a complaint for visitation. On June 11, 2012, appellant filed an amended
answer setting forth affirmative defenses including insufficiency of process and lack of
personal jurisdiction. On November 16, 2012, appellant was personally served the
complaint, but allegedly not the summons.
{¶2} By judgment entry filed February 1, 2013, the trial court found visitation
with appellee was not in the child's best interest "at this time," and ordered appellant to
arrange for the child to undergo a psychological evaluation and follow all relative
recommendations relative to the child's care.
{¶3} On March 4, 2013, appellant filed a motion to vacate the February 1, 2013
judgment entry for lack of personal jurisdiction and motion to dismiss the complaint for
insufficient process. By judgment entry filed May 3, 2013, the trial court denied the
motions.
{¶4} Appellant filed two appeals and this matter is now before this court for
consideration. Assignments of error are identical in both cases and are as follows:
I
{¶5} "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN EXERCISING PERSONAL
JURISDICTION OVER DEFENDANT/APPELLANT."
II
{¶6} "THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN DENYING
DEFENDANT'S/APPELLANT'S MOTION TO VACATE AND MOTION TO DISMISS."
Stark County, Case Nos. 2013CA00042 & 2012CA00099 3
I, II
{¶7} Appellant claims the trial court erred in exercising personal jurisdiction
over her and in denying her motion to vacate and motion to dismiss.
{¶8} Appellant's motions to vacate/dismiss centered upon whether the process
server served her with a summons as required by Civ.R. 4(A): "Upon the filing of the
complaint the clerk shall forthwith issue a summons for service upon each defendant
listed in the caption. Upon request of the plaintiff separate or additional summons shall
issue at any time against any defendant." Civ.R. 4(E) states the following:
If a service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a
defendant within six months after the filing of the complaint and the party
on whose behalf such service was required cannot show good cause why
such service was not made within that period, the action shall be
dismissed as to that defendant without prejudice upon the court's own
initiative with notice to such party or upon motion.***
{¶9} In her affidavit filed March 4, 2013, appellant averred "[t]he Praecipe listing
of papers to be served upon me did not include Summons and no Summons was in the
subject envelope; and I have not otherwise ever been served Summons attendant to
Plaintiff's Complaint."
{¶10} In response, Jeffrey Smith, the appointed process server in the case,
averred in his affidavit filed April 29, 2013 the following:
Stark County, Case Nos. 2013CA00042 & 2012CA00099 4
On or about November 16, 2012, all documents were personally
served, by me upon the Defendant Amelia Digiantonia which included the
summons, complaint of visitation, affidavit working for kids working
seminar notice, working for kids educational seminar packet, Plaintiff's
Motion to appoint Guardian, the Order appointing Guardian and the
Plaintiff's UCCJEA affidavit as well as his financial statement.
{¶11} Thereafter, Mary Saylor, an employee of appellant's counsel, filed her
affidavit, attached to appellant's reply memorandum filed May 1, 2013, and averred a
search of the trial court's docket established a summons was not included: "I was able
to obtain a copy of the aforesaid November 16, 2012 Return of Service filing (a true
copy of which filing is attached hereto), but the counter employee, whose name I
believe is Jen, advised she could not provide me a copy of the aforesaid Summons, as
her office does not maintain copies of same."
{¶12} The praecipe filed June 5, 2012 requested the following:
TO THE CLERK:
Please serve a copy of the Complaint for Visitation, Affidavit,
Motion to Appoint Guardian Ad Litem, Order Appointing Guardian Litem,
Working Together for Kids Educational Seminar, Financial Affidavit,
UCCJEA, and the Judgment Entries from January 11, 2012, January 26,
2012, April 18, 2012 and May 21, 2012, filed in the above-captioned
matter by Private Process Server, Mindy Richmond, upon the
Stark County, Case Nos. 2013CA00042 & 2012CA00099 5
Defendant, AMELIA DIGIANTONIA NKA OSTROWSKI, at the following
address:
AMELIA DIGIANTONIA NKA OSTROWSKI
C/O WALSH UNIVERSITY
2020 EAST MAPLE STREET
NORTH CANTON OH 44720-3396
{¶13} In her June 11, 2012 amended answer, appellant properly raised as her
"Fifth Defense" "insufficiency of process and/or for insufficiency of service of process."
In her "Ninth Defense," she contested "personal jurisdiction."
{¶14} We note the trial court denied appellant's motions without holding a
hearing. Because of the factual issue raised by the competing affidavits and the
wording of the praecipe, we reverse the trial court's decisions and remand the matter to
the trial court to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issues of sufficiency of process and
personal jurisdiction. Cogswell v. Cardio Clinic of Stark County, Inc., 5th Dist. Stark No.
CA-8553, 1991 WL 242070 (Oct. 21, 1991).
{¶15} Assignments of Error I and II are granted.
Stark County, Case Nos. 2013CA00042 & 2012CA00099 6
{¶16} The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio is
hereby reversed and remanded for an evidentiary hearing on the issues of sufficiency of
process and personal jurisdiction.
By Farmer, P.J.
Wise, J. and
Baldwin, J. concur.
_______________________________
Hon. Sheila G. Farmer
_______________________________
Hon. John W. Wise
_______________________________
Hon. Craig R. Baldwin
SGF/sg 115
[Cite as Turnmire v. Ostrowski, 2013-Ohio-5154.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR STARK COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JOHN TURNMIRE :
:
Plaintiff-Appellee :
:
-vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY
:
AMELIA OSTROWSKI, AKA :
AMELIA DIGIANTONIA :
: CASE NOS. 2013CA00042
Defendant-Appellant : 2013CA00099
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion, the
judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Stark County, Ohio is reversed and the
matter is remanded to said court for an evidentiary hearing on the issues of sufficiency
of process and personal jurisdiction. Costs to appellee.
_______________________________
Hon. Sheila G. Farmer
_______________________________
Hon. John W. Wise
_______________________________
Hon. Craig R. Baldwin