State ex rel. Berlingeri

[Cite as State ex rel. Berlingeri, 2014-Ohio-406.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100671 STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. DOMINIC BERLINGERI RELATOR vs. JUDGE BRIAN J. CORRIGAN RESPONDENT JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 470804 Order No. 471571 RELEASE DATE: February 4, 2014 FOR RELATOR Dominic Berlingeri, Jr. Inmate No. A 583-358 Allen Correctional Institution Attn: Unit C 2338 North West Street Lima, OH 45801 ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor BY: James E. Moss Assistant Prosecuting Attorney The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113 SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.: {¶1} On November 26, 2013, relator Dominic Berlingeri commenced this procedendo action against Judge Brian Corrigan to compel him to rule on his petition to vacate allied offenses of similar import in State v. Berlingeri, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-527719-G, which was filed on March 29, 2013. On December 18, 2013, respondent judge filed a motion for summary judgment, which Berlingeri has not opposed. The motion for summary judgment is granted, and the petition is denied for the reasons that follow. {¶2} Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a journal entry that indicates that on December 17, 2013, Judge Corrigan denied Berlingeri’s petition to vacate allied offenses of similar import, rendering the petition for a writ of procedendo moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983); State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 658 N.E.2d 723 (1996). Additionally, the petition does not comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a), which is a separate ground that warrants dismissal. State ex rel. Fuller v. Friedland, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 76750, 1999 Ohio App. LEXIS 4856 (Oct. 14, 1999), citing State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common Pleas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 69707 (Dec. 1, 1995) (“failure to provide this court with a supporting affidavit warrants dismissal”). {¶3} Accordingly, we grant the respondent’s unopposed motion for summary judgment. Respondent to bear costs, but costs are waived. It is further ordered that the clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B). {¶4} Writ denied. SEAN C. GALLAGHER, JUDGE MARY J. BOYLE, A.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR