[Cite as State v. Bennett, 2014-Ohio-212.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
No. 100028
STATE OF OHIO
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
vs.
DEONTE R. BENNETT
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JUDGMENT:
AFFIRMED
Criminal Appeal from the
Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CR-535160
BEFORE: E.T. Gallagher, J., Keough, P.J., and Kilbane, J.
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: January 23, 2014
FOR APPELLANT
Deonte Bennett, pro se
Inmate #590-951
Grafton Correctional Institution
2500 South Avon-Belden Road
Grafton, Ohio 44044
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Timothy J. McGinty
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: Daniel T. Van
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney
The Justice Center, 8th Floor
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, Ohio 44113
EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J.:
{¶1} This cause came to be heard on the accelerated calendar pursuant to App.R.
11.1 and Loc.R. 11.1.
{¶2} Defendant-appellant, Deonte R. Bennett (“Bennett”), appeals the denial of his
motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We find no merit to the appeal and affirm.
{¶3} In March 2010, Bennett was indicted in CR-535160 with drug trafficking,
drug possession, tampering with evidence, and possession of criminal tools. A week
later he was charged with a single count of drug possession in CR-535402. In
CR-535160, Bennett pleaded guilty to drug possession, a third-degree felony, and the
remaining charges were dismissed. In CR-535402, he pleaded guilty to the reduced
charge of attempted drug possession, a first-degree misdemeanor.
{¶4} In June 2010, Bennett was charged with drug trafficking, drug possession,
and possession of criminal tools in a third case, CR-538045. In this case, Bennett
pleaded guilty to drug possession, a fourth-degree felony, and the remaining charges were
dismissed. Following Bennett’s guilty plea in CR-538045, the court sentenced him on all
three cases. In CR-535160, the court sentenced Bennett to four years and a $5,000 fine
for the third-degree felony. In CR-535402, the court imposed a $250 fine for the
first-degree misdemeanor. In CR-538045, the court sentenced Bennett to 17 months in
prison for the fourth-degree drug possession charge, to be served consecutive to the
four-year sentence in CR-535160. The court also suspended Bennett’s driver’s license
and informed him that he would be subject to three years mandatory postrelease control
following his release from prison. Bennett appealed the sentence, and this court affirmed
the trial court’s judgment.
{¶5} In May 2013, Bennett filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea, arguing the
trial court failed to substantially comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a) and that his plea was
not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made. The trial court denied the motion.
Bennett now appeals and raises two assignments of error.
{¶6} In the first assignment of error, Bennett argues the trial court lacked authority
to accept his guilty plea because it failed to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a). In the
second assignment of error, Bennett argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to
withdraw his guilty plea when it was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
Thus, both assignments of error challenge the validity of Bennett’s guilty plea, which is
an issue that could have been litigated in direct appeal.
{¶7} Res judicata bars the assertion of claims against a valid, final judgment of
conviction that has been raised or could have been raised on appeal. State v. Perry, 10
Ohio St.2d 175, 180, 226 N.E.2d 104 (1967). Indeed, the Ohio Supreme Court has
specifically held that res judicata bars the assertion of claims in a motion to withdraw a
guilty plea that were or could have been raised on appeal. State v. Ketterer, 126 Ohio
St.3d 448, 2010-Ohio-3831, 935 N.E.2d 9, ¶ 59.
{¶8} Bennett could have challenged the propriety of the plea colloquy and the
validity of his guilty plea in his direct appeal, but he did not. These claims are therefore
barred by res judicata. Accordingly, we overrule Bennett’s two assignments of error.
{¶9} Judgment affirmed.
It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the common
pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. The defendant’s conviction having
been affirmed, any bail pending appeal is terminated. Case remanded to the trial court
for execution of sentence.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of
the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, JUDGE
KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, P.J., and
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR