[Cite as State ex rel. Jackson v. Official Court Reporter, 2012-Ohio-3968.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
No. 98346
STATE OF OHIO EX REL.,
THEODORE JACKSON
RELATOR
vs.
OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, ET AL.
RESPONDENTS
JUDGMENT:
WRIT DENIED
Writ of Mandamus
Motion No. 455633
Order No. 457854
RELEASE DATE: August 29, 2012
FOR RELATOR
Theodore Jackson, Pro Se
Inmate No. 590406
Marion Correctional Institution
P.O. Box 57
940 Marion-Williamsport Road
Marion, OH 43302
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS
William D. Mason
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
BY: James E. Moss
Assistant County Prosecutor
The Justice Center, 8th Floor
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, OH 44113
MELODY J. STEWART, P.J.:
{¶1} Theodore Jackson has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus, through
which he seeks an order that requires the following: (1) compel Judge Ambrose to
approve an App.R. 9(C) and App.R. 9(D) statement of evidence for use in an appeal that
is pending before this court, State v. Jackson, 8th Dist. No. 98157; (2) compel Judge
Ambrose to rule on pending motions that were filed in State v. Jackson, Cuyahoga C.P.
No. CR-527856; (3) compel Judge Ambrose to issue findings of fact and conclusions of
law with regard to the denial of Jackson’s petition to vacate and set aside judgment of
conviction and sentence; (4) compel the Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts to withdraw
the original papers filed in State v. Jackson, 8th Dist. No. 98157; and (5) compel the
Cuyahoga County Court Reporter’s Office to provide a free copy of the trial transcript in
CR-527856 for use in the pending appeal of State v. Jackson, 8th Dist. No. 98157. For
the following reasons, we decline to issue a writ of mandamus to Jackson.
{¶2} In order for this court to issue a writ of mandamus, Jackson must establish
that: (1) he possesses a clear legal right to the requested relief; (2) Judge Ambrose, the
Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts, and the Cuyahoga County Court Reporter’s Office
possess a clear legal duty to perform the requested acts; and (3) there exists no plain and
adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel., Ney v. Niehaus, 33 Ohio
St.3d 118, 515 N.E.2d 914 (1987); State ex rel., Harris v. Rhodes, 54 Ohio St.2d 41, 373
N.E.2d 641 (1978); State ex rel., Natl. City Bank v. Bd. of Edn., 52 Ohio St.2d 81, 369
N.E.2d 1200 (1977). Herein, Jackson has failed to establish that he possesses any clear
legal right to the requested relief and that the respondents possess any clear legal duty to
perform the requested acts.
{¶3} Specifically, we find that:
(1) Judge Ambrose possesses no duty to approve an App.R. 9(C) and 9(D)
statement of evidence filed in CR-527856. On May 25, 2012, this court sua sponte
amended the praecipe, filed in App. No. 98157, to an App.R. 9(A) record with the record
being deemed complete for purposes of the appeal. See motion no. 455332. Jackson’s
request for a writ of mandamus, with regard to Judge Ambrose’s approval of an App.R.
9(C) and 9(D) statement, is moot. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common
Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel., Gantt v.
Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).
(2) Jackson’s request for rulings on pending motions is moot and/or Judge
Ambrose possesses no duty to issue rulings. On March 23, 2012, Judge Ambrose denied
Jackson’s motion for preparation of a transcript. On March 23, 2012, Judge Ambrose
denied Jackson’s motion for the appointment of an official court reporter to prepare the
transcript. On June 1, 2012, Judge Ambrose denied Jackson’s motion for the
appointment of counsel for appeal. Judge Ambrose possesses no duty to approve a
statement of the evidence or a statement of proceeding, because the record in App. No.
98157 was amended to an App.R. 9(A) record. Judge Ambrose possesses no duty to
issue findings of fact and conclusions of law, because a review of the docket in
CR-527856 fails to disclose that Jackson filed a motion for findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
(3) Judge Ambrose possesses no duty to issue findings of fact with regard to a
petition for postconviction relief that was untimely filed. R.C. 2953.21(A)(2); State ex
rel., James v. Coyne, 114 Ohio St.3d 45, 2007-Ohio-2716, 867 N.E.2d 837; State ex rel.,
Stadmire v. Kilbane-Koch, 8th Dist. No. 93578, 2009-Ohio-3747.
(4) The Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts possesses no duty to withdraw the
original papers filed in App. No. 98157. To the contrary, the clerk possesses the duty to
transfer the original papers pursuant to App.R. 9.
(5) The Cuyahoga County Court Reporter’s Office possesses no duty to provide
Jackson with a free copy of the trial transcript of the proceeding recorded in CR-527856
for use in the appeal that is pending in App. No. 98157. As stated previously, no hearing
was conducted by the trial court. In addition, the appeal perfected by Jackson in App.
No. 98157 involves the denial of a motion to withdraw guilty plea and /or petition to
vacate. No transcript is required for the purpose of the appeal that is pending in App.
No. 98157. It must also be noted that due process does not require that indigent civil
litigants must be provided trial transcripts at state’s expense. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S.
12, 76 S.Ct. 585, 100 L.Ed. 891.
{¶4} Accordingly, we find that Jackson has failed to establish that he is entitled to
a writ of mandamus and grant the respondents’ joint motion for summary judgment.
Relator to pay costs. The court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties with notice
of this judgment and its date of entry on the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶5} Writ denied.
MELODY J. STEWART, PRESIDING JUDGE
COLLEEN CONWAY COONEY, J., and
KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR